Three assumptions are implied in this
answer. First, it’s assumed that pilots can do something to keep themselves
safe in an airplane. Second, pilots know the ideal or best behavior to
use in any given situation aloft to protect themselves and their passengers.
Third, pilots are capable of bringing their actual behavior in line with the
ideal pilot behavior appropriate for any given circumstance.
Let’s begin with the first assumption. Can a pilot do something to keep himself safe
in an airplane?
You bet.
Authorities tell us that nearly 75% of
all accidents are the result of pilot error. After talking to literally
thousands upon thousands of pilots for the past 30 years, my experience tells
me the percentage is really much, much higher. Nearly all aviation accidents
are the result of something over which the pilot has influence. True, in the
murky badlands of fate, a pilot might find himself the unfortunate victim of a
manufacturing defect or another man’s carelessness. But these events are so
extremely rare that they shouldn’t be considered a variable in the safety
equation. I hate to be the reluctant assassin of luck—a concept held reverent by some in our aviation community—but
too many pilots have flown without accident for far too long to say that they
were just lucky. Pilots can do something to keep themselves safe in the air.
Whatever that thing may be can surely be called the ideal flying behavior.
Now for the second
assumption. Do pilots know the
ideal or best behavior to use in any given situation aloft to keep themselves safe? I believe that most do.If we could visit the home library of
a pilot who busted an airplane, I suspect you’d find that he was much more like
you than you might think. He’d most likely have the same aviation books, the
same aviation magazine subscriptions and the same aviation organization
memberships as you do. Were we able to travel back in time and chat with this
fellow before his final flight, I have little doubt that he’d convince you of
his ability to fly safely, even on the day of the accident. If, on our same
trip back in time, we could have this pilot fly with an FAA inspector named Mr. Herzsyur Pinkslip, I
suspect that his performance would be sufficient to convince the feds that he’d
be a safe pilot. That’s because most pilots have a pretty good idea of what it
takes to behave safely in the air at any given time. The real issue here is why
a pilot who knows how to be safe didn’t behave that way on accident day.
The final assumption. Are pilots capable of doing something to
bring their actual behavior in line with the ideal pilot behavior appropriate
for any given circumstance? Modern psychology says absolutely!
When a pilot crashes an airplane, it’s
quite common to hear his friends say, “I can’t believe Bud crashed, he was such
a good pilot.” If we accept the traditional definition of good, then we can’t help but wonder how a good pilot can smash an airplane. Given a pilot’s sovereign control
over his machine, it’s likely that he crashed because of something he did or
didn’t do. Ultimately, the logic here dissolves into the simple truth that
while Bud may be a good pilot, he obviously wasn’t quite that good on the day
he crashed. Why not?
On any given day a pilot is most safe
when his attitude is appropriate for
the circumstances involving his flight. The fact is, we don’t always comport
ourselves in the most appropriate way when aloft. We may be a bit distracted, a
bit anxious, a bit rushed, a bit aggressive and so on, all of which may not be appropriate
for the given circumstances of flight. All of these mental dispositions are the
result of an attitude, and it’s our attitude that determines the immediate
trajectory of our behavior.
Attitudes are mental schemes that
influence how we act in the short term. Unfortunately, attitudes are often easy
to influence and quick to change, and they frequently
do so without our being aware of the switch. For instance, one research study
indicated that something as inconsequential as finding a dollar on a street
corner could change someone’s dour attitude to a happy disposition. That’s why,
when your instructor was about to solo you, he or she gave you a little speech
to help align your present attitude with the one necessary to make your solo
safer. On my first solo, my instructor said, “Remember, it will be lighter with
me out of the plane and it will want to climb faster.” Unfortunately, I was so
darn nervous I thought he said, “Revenge her, it grills my ladder, it will help
extinguish the pain and you'll turn to crime faster.” That made me even more
nervous. Personally, I would have preferred that he’d just given me a dollar
and skipped the speech. That dollar would have made me happy.
Several years ago, two airplanes
collided in the practice area over the costal waters of Southern
California When the instructor of one airplane entered the
practice area that morning, his attitude most likely influenced him to maintain
sufficient vigilance in seeing and avoiding traffic. Then something happened to
change his mental disposition. Perhaps he thought it necessary to focus more
attention on his student than looking for traffic. Just suppose, however, that
he took a moment for self-reflection and thought, “I’m in the practice area,
one of the busiest areas in the entire nation, so I better pay more attention
to what’s happening outside this cockpit.” Had he done that, he might have
immediately changed his attitude and resumed scanning for traffic. Changing his
attitude would have led him to mimic the behavior that an ideal pilot would
demonstrate when operating in similar high-traffic circumstances. I have little
doubt this unfortunate instructor would choose to be more vigilant for traffic were he given another chance to do so.
The main reason a pilot, even a more experienced
one, crashes an airplane on any given day has more to do with his attitude than
anything else. Even those people we call good
pilots are only as safe as their ability to choose the right attitude for
any given circumstance. The sad fact is that not every pilot makes this
choice—and it is a matter of pilot choice. Now you know how it’s possible for a
less experienced pilot to fly more safely than someone with more experience on
any given day.
Doesn’t experience count for something?
You bet it does. An experienced pilot is more likely to choose the right
attitude for any given condition of flight, but not always because he makes a
conscious choice to do so. Sure, he can catch himself with a less-than-helpful
attitude and change it. All of us can do that. Experience pays off in that it
biases a pilot towards having the proper attitude for any given circumstance by
reinforcing a set of values, values forged through many long years of practical
aviation education. While attitudes influence our actions in the short term,
values represent the fixed star by which our behavior is steered in the long
term. If you value good flight preparation, well maintained equipment, wise
counsel and investing your money in proficiency training, then you’re most
likely to have the right attitude most of the time.
If you’re a pilot without much
experience, find comfort in knowing that your safety is greatly influenced by
the attitudes you choose for any given circumstance of flight. The aviation
version of common sense suggests you already know what these attitudes are and
psychology tells us you can choose to change yours as you see fit. When you
hear about an experienced pilot crumpling an airplane, it’s a good bet that he
didn’t encounter a problem that would have easily overwhelmed a less
experienced aviator. Instead, he was most likely the victim of a human frailty
that affects each and every one of us. He didn’t monitor himself sufficiently
to ensure that his attitude was appropriate for the given circumstances of flight.
Don’t let the same happen to you.